Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that match
the location description.
Nan
Natomas Oaks difficulties
7 messages in this thread |
Started on 2004-06-09
Natomas Oaks difficulties
From: Nan (naf1234@aol.com) |
Date: 2004-06-09 00:27:23 UTC
Re: [LbNCA] Natomas Oaks difficulties
From: Dan Blackburn (star@northcoast.com) |
Date: 2004-06-08 19:37:57 UTC-07:00
Hi,
I found the box on February 20th. It was in great shape and well hidden. It definitely took some figuring, but isn't that the fun of it? =D
-Shifteight
----- Original Message -----
From: Nan
To: LbNCA@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: [LbNCA] Natomas Oaks difficulties
Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that match
the location description.
Nan
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LbNCA/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LbNCA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I found the box on February 20th. It was in great shape and well hidden. It definitely took some figuring, but isn't that the fun of it? =D
-Shifteight
----- Original Message -----
From: Nan
To: LbNCA@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: [LbNCA] Natomas Oaks difficulties
Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that match
the location description.
Nan
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LbNCA/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
LbNCA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Natomas Oaks difficulties
From: Jennie (jennie@spinning-jennie.com) |
Date: 2004-06-09 02:42:21 UTC
We moved away from the spot in January (we used to live right across
the street - which is why we hid it there ;-) - and would check it
regularly). Maybe we'll go down and take a look this weekend...
Jennie
--- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, "Nan"
> Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
> was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
> still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that
match
> the location description.
> Nan
Re: Natomas Oaks difficulties
From: Nan (naf1234@aol.com) |
Date: 2004-06-09 20:42:11 UTC
Dan:
I've got renewed hope. Thanks.
Nan
--- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, "Dan Blackburn" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the box on February 20th. It was in great shape and well
hidden. It definitely took some figuring, but isn't that the fun of
it? =D
>
> -Shifteight
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nan
> To: LbNCA@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:27 PM
> Subject: [LbNCA] Natomas Oaks difficulties
>
>
> Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
> was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
> still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that match
> the location description.
> Nan
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LbNCA/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> LbNCA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I've got renewed hope. Thanks.
Nan
--- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, "Dan Blackburn"
> Hi,
>
> I found the box on February 20th. It was in great shape and well
hidden. It definitely took some figuring, but isn't that the fun of
it? =D
>
> -Shifteight
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nan
> To: LbNCA@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 5:27 PM
> Subject: [LbNCA] Natomas Oaks difficulties
>
>
> Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
> was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
> still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that match
> the location description.
> Nan
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LbNCA/
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> LbNCA-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Natomas Oaks difficulties
From: Nan (naf1234@aol.com) |
Date: 2004-06-09 20:43:40 UTC
Hi Jennie:
One of the list members, Dan, just posted a message that the LB was
alive and well in February, so I guess we just need to look even harder!
Nan
--- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, "Jennie" wrote:
>
> We moved away from the spot in January (we used to live right across
> the street - which is why we hid it there ;-) - and would check it
> regularly). Maybe we'll go down and take a look this weekend...
>
> Jennie
>
> --- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, "Nan" wrote:
> > Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
> > was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
> > still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that
> match
> > the location description.
> > Nan
One of the list members, Dan, just posted a message that the LB was
alive and well in February, so I guess we just need to look even harder!
Nan
--- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, "Jennie"
>
> We moved away from the spot in January (we used to live right across
> the street - which is why we hid it there ;-) - and would check it
> regularly). Maybe we'll go down and take a look this weekend...
>
> Jennie
>
> --- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, "Nan"
> > Does anyone know if the Natomas Oaks box is sill viable? The clue
> > was written more than a year ago and after 2 trips to the site, we
> > still can't find the box even though we found a few spots that
> match
> > the location description.
> > Nan
Re: [LbNCA] Natomas Oaks difficulties
From: (Sierra64@aol.com) |
Date: 2004-06-10 14:01:48 UTC-04:00
I found it in early May, alive and well, tough but fun
Sierra Sally
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sierra Sally
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: Natomas Oaks difficulties
From: Nan (naf1234@aol.com) |
Date: 2004-06-11 16:56:19 UTC
Hi Sierra Sally:
Well, that settles it. We just have to go back and try again...Thanks
for the update.
Nan
--- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, Sierra64@a... wrote:
> I found it in early May, alive and well, tough but fun
> Sierra Sally
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Well, that settles it. We just have to go back and try again...Thanks
for the update.
Nan
--- In LbNCA@yahoogroups.com, Sierra64@a... wrote:
> I found it in early May, alive and well, tough but fun
> Sierra Sally
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]